
Author note: “Oy” is an interjection jused to express dismay, frustration, pain or concern, originating primarily from Yiddish (Merriam Webster)
August’s traditional vacation period is nearing its end end pro golf’s competitive season is closing with it. As a matter of fact, my senior league’s final team competition occurs next week. So, it seems appropriate to wrap up the season with some final thoughts on golf etymology, the avian jargon that pervades the sport, and a curated list of books centered on it.
GOLF ETYMOLOGY: ORIGIN OF THE DISCUSSION
What prompted this discussion resulted from a unique occurrence in my golf game. I scored an eagle during our league’s mid-summer scramble. For those who don’t know or are disinclined to subscribe and read about it in my FREE monthly newsletter, an eagle is the term applied to sinking the ball into the cup in two strokes rather the prescribed four or three for a par-five hole.
Of course, this announcement fostered an explication on what constitutes par, the terminology assigned to those scores one, two, and even three strokes less than par, and a brief history of how “birdie,” “eagle,” and “albatross” came to be. Unsurprisingly, the terms originated out of American slang popular during the late 19th and early 20th century.
GOLF ETYMOLOGY: NOTICEABLE BY ITS ABSENCE
Almost as soon as I completed the piece, it occurred to me that I had omitted discussing the terminology for scores that many players are more likely to encounter: scores one, two and more above par. Perhaps due to the shame and, more likely, the frustration and the ignominy attached to such scores, they are not honored with individual epithets. They are simply called bogey, double bogey, triple bogey, etc.
According to the website, Scottish Golf History, the origin of the term “bogey” is truly spooky. During the course of one match play competion at Yarmouth, one player said of his competitor’s ability that he must be “a regular Bogey man, a reference to the Edwardian music hall song “Hush! Hush! Hush! Here Comes the Bogey Man.” Regardless of the source’s veracity, the term had been in general Soottish use since the 16th century and widely used for a goblin or devil.
However, some horrendous feats do engender special renown. A score of four above par on a par 4 hole (the most common on a course) is referred to as a “snowman.” This slang term derives from appearance on a standard scorecard, an “eight” written basically as two circles on top of one another.
GOLF ETYMOLOGY: FICTIONAL CONTEXTS
Those of you who have come to expect some relationship between the blog topic at hand and fiction-writing (e.g. my post on Shelley’s poem), rest easy. Here are four iconic novels to tide you through the dark nights of winter until spring comes again and golfers haunt and curse the links once more:
- The Legend of Bagger Vance (Steven Pressfield)–set during the Great Depression, this retelling of the Bhagavad Gita uses a high-stakes golf match as a canvas for a traumatized war hero to find his authentic swing and his soul.
- The Great Gatsby (F. Scott Fitzgerald)–Exposing the casual dishonesty and moral laxity of the elite, Jordan Baker is a professional golfer whose cheating scandal on the links mirrors the hidden corruption underlying the Jazz Age.
- Golf in the Kingdom (Michael Murphy)–A mystical round of golf in Scotland provides the setting for eastern philosophy, human consciousness, and the spiritual nature of the swing.
- Dead Solid Perfect (Dan Jenkins)–gritty, humorous look at the grueling, unglamorous life of a journeyman pro trying to make it on the PGA Tour.
GOLF ETYMOLOGY: THE 19TH HOLE
Not surprisingly, we end this discussion with another American slang expression. Neither an avian nor bogeyman reference, the term does originate from Scotland, however. Golf being played over 18th holes, Golf Dictionary states the 19th hole refers to “a pub, bar, or restaurant on or near the golf course, very often the clubhouse itself.”ound of golf has only eighteen (18) holes of play. An alternate term is a “watering hole.”
Concluding on a literary note, the English writer and humorist, P.G. Wodehouse, discusses the 19th hole in his collection of golfing stories. You may groan at the pun in the title, but my efforts at levity, literature, and etymology, it seems, share some good company.
What do you think? Let me know in the Leave a Contact section below.












This tip elaborates on what appears above. Just as writers slant their stories to the values, interests, and expectations of their readerships, power panelists direct their responses toward the topic at hand with their audience in mind. Does it consist primarily of writers or academics? Or is it composed primarily of readers and fantasy fans?
For some panel members, this tip may contradict the concept of a panel discussion, i.e. a discussion among the members of a panel. Regardless of that, some of the best discussions I’ve witnessed resulted from questions or observations contributed by the audience. If a topic is provocative enough in itself, or if the panel discussion of it is sufficiently free-flowing and involving, such discussion conduces a dialog between the panel and its listeners. Not only does such involvement measure a power panelist and a panel’s success as entertainers, it liberates creative ideas panel members may never have considered.
This point may be in the convention guidelines, but it bears repeating. Power panelists respect the ideas and beliefs of all participants, panelists and audience members alike. To facilitate that respect, the moderator should lay out the ground rules before the start of discussion. Most often, that means reigning in those individuals whose enthusiasm for a particular topic overwhelms their inhibitions and consideration for others.



Artificial Intelligence (AI) already affects writers and the publishing industry. However, the recent release of ChatGPT threatens authors’ livelihoods on a whole new level. In a
itemizes the opportunities AI offers in terms of acquisitiion, production, and marketing. In his view, AI could depose Amazon, the over-charging, 800-pound gorilla in the publishing industry. While independent publishers like him might welcome the overthrow of their competition, individual entrepreneurs, writers, and artists could find themselves shoved further down down the publicity and marketing chain. McElroy’s analysis is astute, but relies heavily on his approach of book publishing being an information-dispensing industry.
As individuals, people respond to differIent stimuli differently.
binder for my proposed work, Black Phantom. The binder remained empty for years, however, because I had no access to horses of any kind. Finally, when the chance to ride one did happen, I clung to the saddle horn for all I was worth while the horse galloped back to its stall for a fresh bucket of oats. However, the action, the adventure, the thrill of that incident stayed with me. Like Farley’s narrative of a boy’s enduring love for his horse, these qualities inspired the path I’ve chosen these many decades later.
For these individuals and the people inspired by them, “good enough” is not acceptable. Publishing information remains limited to the 
Development
Deemphasis and Revival



